
Artificial intelligence (AI) has made remarkable strides in recent years. From drafting documents to scanning case law (if the AI actually has access to a legal data base which is not always the case), AI tools can process information faster than ever before.
These advances are exciting, and they can assist in how lawyers and clients access legal information.
But here’s the caution: AI is not a substitute for legal advice.
For example, AI was used to do the initial draft of this blog, but the AI was directed or guided by an experienced lawyer who knows the issues, who did not just ask a simple question and then made significant additions and edits to get the final product.
Anyone can read the law. AI can even summarize it for you. But the practice of law is not just about statutes and cases — it’s about experience, judgment, and human understanding.
Far from being replaced, lawyers are more essential than ever. Even the AI companies that connect to legal databases hire lawyers to review outputs and identify where the technology falls short. That fact alone underscores the irreplaceable value of human expertise.
Family lawyers, in particular, bring a blend of legal knowledge, courtroom experience, and emotional intelligence that no algorithm can replicate.
When you retain a lawyer, you’re not just hiring someone who knows the law. You’re gaining a guide who has walked the path many times before, who understands the terrain of local courts, and who can help you navigate both the legal and emotional challenges of your case.
AI may be a powerful tool, but it is not a replacement for the wisdom, judgment, and advocacy of an experienced lawyer.
Final thought: Lawyers are not out of date. They are the bridge between the written law and the lived reality of the courtroom, or the mediation and arbitration rooms — and that bridge cannot be automated.
Long before AI lawyers would caution clients from relying on their “Greek Chorus”. That well meaning family and friends who share advice about family law without themselves being a family lawyer or having the distance to be objective.
The danger is that your lawyer now must spend much more time, and your money, disabusing you of the ideas you are getting from your family, friends, the internet and AI.
Lawyers manage two negotiations at the same time – one with the other side, but the more important one is with their own client. Most lawyers end up working hard to have the client
understand and adopt the lawyer’s advice when it is different then the client learned from a source that is not an experienced family law lawyer.
What is telling is that family lawyers going through their own family law issues hire other family lawyers to help them. Not for the law – but for the objectivity and independent counsel.
Conclusion: Use AI, certainly, but recognize its limitations and do not bet your life, your company or your case on it. Always verify anything AI tells you and always make sure when you have a family law issue to get your real advice from an experienced family law lawyer.